The Latest

Apr 24, 2014
Apr 22, 2014
Law School and B-School Debates

Guest Diarist  |  April 21, 2014

At Penn Law, I have really enjoyed the Socratic method of learning. With this method, Professors encourage students to question their beliefs about the facts of a case, as well as what the law ought to be. This method facilitates debate amongst students. It doesn’t come as a surprise that law school students enjoy debating ideas. But these debates are not only enjoyable – there are also valuable in helping people of diverse backgrounds feel like they have a place at the school.

The law school has students who believe in Kantian ethics – that the law should encourage good for the sake of the good itself. Other students are Utilitarian and believe that laws should be enacted if their benefits outweigh their costs. While some students focus on the individual, others are more concerned about groups. At law school, it does not matter how unconventional your viewpoint is; your views are welcome in the classroom.

As I began taking Wharton classes, I was concerned that business school would have a singular perspective of maximizing profits. And where I would fit in such a setting considering I have usually been motivated more by means than by ends? As such, I was pleasantly surprised to see my b-school classmates engage in vigorous debates on a variety of different topics, such as:

1. Should an employer be able to reject a job candidate for a job requiring a high level of time commitment because such candidate has children?
2. Will an employer be more profitable by paying its employees below-market or above-market wages?
3. Should a corporation’s (sole or primary) purpose be to maximize profits?

Wharton professors recognize that management has fiduciary duties to enhance firm value. However, firm value can be enhanced even by costly actions such as those involving corporate social responsibility. For example, one of our case studies in global management concerned a mining company that engaged with the community where it mined, and provided better working conditions to its miners. The company ended up making higher profits due to these more humane policies. By engaging with the surrounding community and treating its workers better, the mining company found that its plant had a lower incidence of protests and strikes. As such, its mining operations continued on schedule, and the company subsequently had lower costs.

Although business school focuses more on Utilitarian ideologies, the corporate goal of enhancing firm value is not limited to maximizing current profits. Firms frequently find that following Kantian ethics of treating employees, communities, and customers more humanely, they are able to sustain higher profits in the long-term. Such humane policies can frequently enable a firm to build intangible assets such as a stronger brand and goodwill (not the accounting kind) in the community. And consequently, Kantians like me find a place in b-school debates.

- Chandni Saxena, L15 WG15
Guest Diarist  |  April 21, 2014	 |  General Diaries, In The Classroom
Apr 22, 2014

Law School and B-School Debates

Guest Diarist | April 21, 2014

At Penn Law, I have really enjoyed the Socratic method of learning. With this method, Professors encourage students to question their beliefs about the facts of a case, as well as what the law ought to be. This method facilitates debate amongst students. It doesn’t come as a surprise that law school students enjoy debating ideas. But these debates are not only enjoyable – there are also valuable in helping people of diverse backgrounds feel like they have a place at the school.

The law school has students who believe in Kantian ethics – that the law should encourage good for the sake of the good itself. Other students are Utilitarian and believe that laws should be enacted if their benefits outweigh their costs. While some students focus on the individual, others are more concerned about groups. At law school, it does not matter how unconventional your viewpoint is; your views are welcome in the classroom.

As I began taking Wharton classes, I was concerned that business school would have a singular perspective of maximizing profits. And where I would fit in such a setting considering I have usually been motivated more by means than by ends? As such, I was pleasantly surprised to see my b-school classmates engage in vigorous debates on a variety of different topics, such as:

1. Should an employer be able to reject a job candidate for a job requiring a high level of time commitment because such candidate has children?
2. Will an employer be more profitable by paying its employees below-market or above-market wages?
3. Should a corporation’s (sole or primary) purpose be to maximize profits?

Wharton professors recognize that management has fiduciary duties to enhance firm value. However, firm value can be enhanced even by costly actions such as those involving corporate social responsibility. For example, one of our case studies in global management concerned a mining company that engaged with the community where it mined, and provided better working conditions to its miners. The company ended up making higher profits due to these more humane policies. By engaging with the surrounding community and treating its workers better, the mining company found that its plant had a lower incidence of protests and strikes. As such, its mining operations continued on schedule, and the company subsequently had lower costs.

Although business school focuses more on Utilitarian ideologies, the corporate goal of enhancing firm value is not limited to maximizing current profits. Firms frequently find that following Kantian ethics of treating employees, communities, and customers more humanely, they are able to sustain higher profits in the long-term. Such humane policies can frequently enable a firm to build intangible assets such as a stronger brand and goodwill (not the accounting kind) in the community. And consequently, Kantians like me find a place in b-school debates.

- Chandni Saxena, L15 WG15
Guest Diarist | April 21, 2014 | General Diaries, In The Classroom

pennlaw:

A law student, two Wharton students, an architecture student, and an education student recently set up an independent study exploring interdisciplinary problem solving and design thinking in international development. They have been working with Glasswing International to help them with their education initiatives in El Salvador.
Over spring break, the group of students traveled to El Salvador to meet with Glasswing staff, visit schools, and conduct observational research. While there, they led a workshop with 80 El Salvadoran leaders from businesses, non-profits, law firms, and government on the role they can play in preventing violence through supporting education. Since arriving back at Penn, they have been continuing to work on coming up with a sustainable solution to improve Glasswing’s education initiatives and curtail the hopelessness that is so prevalent in the education system in El Salvador.
Read more about their work: designingimpact
Apr 11, 2014 / 4 notes

pennlaw:

A law student, two Wharton students, an architecture student, and an education student recently set up an independent study exploring interdisciplinary problem solving and design thinking in international development. They have been working with Glasswing International to help them with their education initiatives in El Salvador.

Over spring break, the group of students traveled to El Salvador to meet with Glasswing staff, visit schools, and conduct observational research. While there, they led a workshop with 80 El Salvadoran leaders from businesses, non-profits, law firms, and government on the role they can play in preventing violence through supporting education. Since arriving back at Penn, they have been continuing to work on coming up with a sustainable solution to improve Glasswing’s education initiatives and curtail the hopelessness that is so prevalent in the education system in El Salvador.

Read more about their work: designingimpact

Wharton JD/MBA Student Interview with Craig Carter
Apr 3, 2014

Wharton JD/MBA Student Interview with Craig Carter

Apr 3, 2014
Penn Law’s Entrepreneurship Legal Clinic is in-demand: Technical.ly Philly
Apr 2, 2014

Penn Law’s Entrepreneurship Legal Clinic is in-demand: Technical.ly Philly

Mar 28, 2014 / 1 note
Welcome future members of the Penn JD/MBA Class of 2017 to Admitted Students Weekend! ‪#‎PennLawASW
Mar 28, 2014

Welcome future members of the Penn JD/MBA Class of 2017 to Admitted Students Weekend! ‪#‎PennLawASW

Dean Fitts delivers opening remarks for the law school’s admitted students weekend #PennLaw #PennLawASW
Mar 28, 2014

Dean Fitts delivers opening remarks for the law school’s admitted students weekend #PennLaw #PennLawASW

Mar 13, 2014 / 6 notes
Mar 13, 2014
Mar 10, 2014 / 1 note
Thanks to Craig Carter, JD/MBA’15, for his warm introduction of Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney, Southern District of New York.  Bharara gave a special lecture to the Penn Law and Wharton communities on Tuesday, March 4.  More information about the lecture can be found here.
Mar 10, 2014

Thanks to Craig Carter, JD/MBA’15, for his warm introduction of Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney, Southern District of New York. Bharara gave a special lecture to the Penn Law and Wharton communities on Tuesday, March 4. More information about the lecture can be found here.

Congratulations to JD/MBA students on their 2nd Place finish in the internal Wharton MBA Buyout Case Competition on February 14 to qualify for the international competition in New York last week. There they competed against 20+ teams from all over the world. 

The Wharton MBA Buyout Case Competition is the premier MBA-level LBO case competition in the world. It brings together teams from the leading business schools around the country and world to evaluate and make recommendations for a proposed PE buyout transaction. Presentations are judged by panel of PE professionals, and extensive networking opportunities are available for participants.

The Penn team comprised of 1L JD/MBA students (from left) Chris Martyn, Greg Caplan, Sean Mahoney, Stephane Essama and James Hopkins.  Congrats JD/MBAs!!
Feb 25, 2014

Congratulations to JD/MBA students on their 2nd Place finish in the internal Wharton MBA Buyout Case Competition on February 14 to qualify for the international competition in New York last week. There they competed against 20+ teams from all over the world.

The Wharton MBA Buyout Case Competition is the premier MBA-level LBO case competition in the world. It brings together teams from the leading business schools around the country and world to evaluate and make recommendations for a proposed PE buyout transaction. Presentations are judged by panel of PE professionals, and extensive networking opportunities are available for participants.

The Penn team comprised of 1L JD/MBA students (from left) Chris Martyn, Greg Caplan, Sean Mahoney, Stephane Essama and James Hopkins. Congrats JD/MBAs!!